A used Volvo excavator was represented as manufactured in 2017; verification indicated 2012.
CASE STUDIES
What happened.
What we did.
What the buyer received.
Cases are published only from verified operations. Client identities and sensitive commercial information remain protected.
NEW PROOF CASE · SAUDI ARABIA
Wrong excavator year → deposit recovered
A material equipment-year mismatch led to refusal of delivery, a final Yiwu court judgment and post-judgment repayment.
VIEW REDACTED PROOF →The seller rejected the discrepancy and refused to return the RMB 10,000 deposit.
Preserved transaction evidence, refused delivery and brought a civil claim in Yiwu.
Final judgment cancelled the sale and ordered repayment. RMB 10,025 was later received.
PUBLISHED CASE · SAUDI ARABIA
23 suppliers → 1 × 40HQ
One overseas buyer needed different Yiwu supplier orders moved through one accountable China-side process.
Twenty-three suppliers with different lead times, packaging standards, quantities and payment steps.
Missing cartons, inconsistent marks, late suppliers and fragmented documentation before loading.
Supplier coordination, order tracking, receiving, quantity checks, repacking, consolidation, export documentation and FCL shipping.
Twenty-three supplier orders consolidated into one controlled 40HQ shipment with receiving and loading records.
COMING FROM VERIFIED RECORDS
The case library will grow
with real evidence.
- Destination and supplier count
- Situation and transaction risk
- Services actually provided
- Redacted warehouse, QC or shipping evidence
- Clear result and responsibility boundaries
HAVE A SIMILAR PURCHASE?